(Re)writing the (His)story of the Zong

In Feeding the Ghosts, a man reimagines women’s suffering during the Transatlantic slave trade — and with more accuracy than female slave writers ever could.

“[I]f the black man is silenced in history, what is the nature of the censure of the black women?”

The main counterfactual element of the novel is thus embodied by the rebellious and independent Mintah, a fictional African woman sold to the Zong, whose survival story, except for her gender, corresponds with that of the only jettison survivor. According to the memoir of the eighteenth-century abolitionist Granville Sharp, one jettisoned male slave survived by “laying hold of a rope which hung from the ship” (Hoare 243), just as Mintah does in Feeding the Ghosts. By altering the survivor’s gender from male to female, D’Aguiar gives a voice to the female slave figure who, before the abolition of slavery, had been oppressed by not only slaveholders but also white readers.

Since the white audience imposed their expectations of true womanhood on female slave characters, requiring them to show

“piety, purity, submissiveness and domesticity” (Welter 152),

Despite Feeding the Ghosts not being an autobiographical account, the text shares many similarities with slave narratives, such as the “description of a cruel master”, “of families being separated and destroyed”, or “of the amounts and kinds of food and clothing given to slaves” (Olney 50–1). However, D’Aguiar not only imitates the genre but also reinvents it by exposing those aspects of slave women’s lives which were hidden by sexism, racism, and social constraints of the antebellum era.

Hence, D’Aguiar changes the gender of the slave who allegedly survived the Zong jettison from male to female in order to depict an enslaved woman’s life in a historically more accurate manner than antebellum female slave narratives could.

[1] The archive of the Zong consists of eyewitness testimonies by the first mate James Kelsall and passenger Robert Stubbs, the governor of Annamaboe (the ship’s logbook disappeared together with the death of its captain Luke Collingwood just a couple of weeks after landing) (Lewis 367). In general, the majority of either slaveholders’ documents or slave accounts were also written by men (Dunaway).

1. Sexual Violence

As Frances Smith Foster notes,

“[s]lave narrators regularly adopted the current literary conventions and made little attempt to create new forms or standards” (44)

However, the female slave writers’ assimilation to “the purely ‘white’ language” connected with “a narrow white Christian morality” of the antebellum era is nowadays considered inadequate for portraying women slaves’ suffering (Tanner 418–9). In Feeding the Ghosts, D’Aguiar avoids this inadequacy by explicitly depicting Mintah’s near-rape experience aboard the Zong: “He knocks me down. Others pin my arms and legs. Then the boatswain stands over me and unbuckles his trousers” (186). By employing the present tense in this particular scene as well as whenever Mintah is the first-person narrator, D’Aguiar achieves a more direct tone than the traditional slave narratives’ past tense, since the attempted sexual assault is narrated as if it were happening in the moment the reader reads the scene.

This sense of immediacy is additionally reinforced as the narrator does not interpret the events but rather restricts herself to an uncommented description of the abuse; in contrast, antebellum female slave narrators narrated their experiences in retrospect, which allowed them to comment on sexual violence, often “referring to rape in the softened term of ‘insult’” (DeGout 3). Thus, female slave narrators used to apologetically appeal to the reader, “speaking in a voice that demands sympathy” (Cutter 222), and to conceal the extent of their sexual abuse.

Since admitting to having been raped meant admitting to one’s loss of purity, the language describing sexual assault in female slave narratives was often marked by “pleading for pity and assistance” from the reader in order to convince the white audience that a slave woman was not a seductress but a victim of crime (Nudelman 939).

Who ordered pepper to be daubed on my eyes? Captain Cunningham. […] And who carried out the order and for good measure rubbed more pepper between my legs and pushed some into my body? The second mate and the boatswain. Who watched and did nothing to stop them? Kelsal. (D’Aguiar 215)

Furthermore, while antebellum ex-slave writers use the passive construction when writing about violence (“was flogged”, “was whipped”, “was stripped”, etc.) to highlight that “the body is an entity imposed upon”, D’Aguiar mostly uses the active voice (“who ordered”, “who rubbed”, “who watched”, etc.) so that the focus is not on the victim but instead on the perpetrator (Barrett 430). This emphasis on the slaver’s role as the initiator of the abuse is also stressed by the series of “who”-questions answered with the names of the Zong crew. While female slave narrators used to appeal “to the emotions of […] readers by clearly depicting the slaves as suffering human beings” when describing sexual violence, Mintah presents the realities of her torture in a sober, almost judicial manner, identifying each culprit by name instead of calling them “master” (Lahure 53). By naming the abusers and highlighting their culpability through the active construction, D’Aguair creates a narrative voice that, instead of seeking sympathy from the reader and excusing the alleged loss of sexual purity, systematically delineates who is to be blamed for the abuse.

2. Motherhood

Another indicator that Feeding the Ghosts provides a historically more accurate portrayal of a slave woman’s life is Mintah’s active rejection of motherhood. As historian Stella Dadzie argues

“slave women had access to means of avoiding childbirth. That they took advantage of them is confirmed by the frequent accusations of planters and doctors” (29).

In Feeding the Ghosts, however, Mintah’s refusal to be used as a breeder for her masters and overseers is openly thematised: in the beginning of the novel, Mintah decides to “dance the death of fertility dance” in order to induce her menstrual bleeding, and hence avoid rape by the ship’s crew, but later regrets her decision (D’Aguiar 31). After realising that even her fertility can be instrumentalised in the hands of slaveholders, Mintah questions her actions:

What fertility gods? Fructification for whose benefit? Her womb ached and her blood flowed for nothing. […] She wanted her blood to run dry and for the intricate apparatus that she harboured inside to dislodge from its moorings and drift out of her; to expel it and never feel that particular pain again and never bleed for any god, any dance. (D’Aguiar 40)

Furthermore, Mintah does not only reject motherhood but also explicitly refuses the idea of her body being used to produce more bodies. Years after the Zong massacre, Mintah, now a free woman, recalls:

On land I waited to bleed. Months became years. Lovers wanted sons and daughters from me. Not for themselves, they professed, but for me, for someone like me, who should be made into newer shapes of people. But the moon failed as a bribe. I remembered the dances but refused to perform them. (D’Aguiar 210)

In Feeding the Ghosts, however, Mintah openly voices her belief that, instead of being sacred, motherhood is an accumulation of a man’s capital and a tool to dehumanise and control women, since as mothers, female slaves had to face further deprivation of their human rights: as Hortense Spillers states, “under conditions of captivity, the offspring of the female d[id] not ‘belong’ to the Mother” but could be taken away from her at any time (74).

Accordingly, even as a free woman Mintah still openly resists to be objectified, reduced to her body and its reproductive abilities, and exploited as an incubator for more bodies by any man, white or black, master or slave.

3. Christianity

A further indication of Feeding the Ghosts depicting an enslaved woman’s life with more historical accuracy than traditional female slave narratives did is that Mintah does not convert to Christianity. Although slaves brought to America had their own religious rituals such as idolatrous dancing — which Mintah performs for the fertility god — the African indigenous religions were supressed by the white masters who condemned such practices as savage and heathen (Floyd 38–9).

Since slave narrators aimed at convincing the white audience that they shared the same moral values, one of the conventions of slave narratives was “a clear presentation of their [the narrators’] Christianity” (Monitz 32). For female ex-slave authors, such as Harriet Jacobs whose autobiography is one of the best-known female slave narratives, this meant that their texts had to highlight a connection “between sexual purity and spirituality, a connection which […] indeed was prevalent among Christians” of the antebellum era (Taves 60). The fact that this convention is “what shaped her [Jacob’s] narrative into the story of a self-sacrificing mother repentant for her sin” of having an affair in order to escape her abusive master exemplifies how strongly Christian values affected the way female ex-slaves narrated their lives (Monitz 32).

Although Mintah also renounces African gods for the Christian God, her conversion is only temporary, since she later admits returning to her spiritual roots (D’Aguiar 64). After surviving the jettison, Mintah acknowledges the African wood-god again, praising him as her saviour, and thus rejects to identify as strictly Christian:

“I am Mintah. I was thrown into the sea and the god of wood held out his hand to me and I took it and climbed out of the sea” (D’Aguiar 134).

Furthermore, Mintah proclaims that even on land “wood has promised salvation”, which highlights that her source of hope and faith is not only the wood-god instead of the Christian God but also the physicality of wood itself as opposed to abstract Christian ideas (Aguiar 210). Wood is a particularly important trope, since Mintah’s relationship with this material functions as a metaphor for her roots and African spirituality throughout the whole text. Taught by her father how to carpenter, Mintah carves figures reminiscent of a “man, woman or child reaching up out of the depths” of the sea to overcome the middle-passage trauma (D’Aguiar 208–9). Her seeking solace not in Christian faith but in a tangible material such as wood represents the female slaves’ need for African spirituality connected to physicality instead of Christian morality suppressing it. This connection between African religions and physicality also becomes apparent as Mintah draws a parallel between her wood carvings and the idolatrous dances typical of African religious ceremonies:

Men and women dance and raise a lot of dust. Drums, whistles, horns, singing and clapping fill my ears, nose, eyes and mouth. […] I have seen these figures in other dreams moving like this. I shaped them out of wood. I thought the shapes were trying to rise from the sea, but now I know they were dances. […] A young woman moves in front of me in a pattern I recognise. I see myself at her age on the deck of the Zong in the throes of the fertility dance. […] I know what she will do before she does it. I remember. I told it in wood. (D’Aguiar 218 –9)

4. Revolt

Despite some historians arguing that women slaves were not involved in revolts “because, as mothers of children and nurturers of their families, they engaged in less confrontational or nonviolent forms of resistance”, others argue that

women-led rebellions not only existed but were also carefully organised, violent in nature, and involved whole communities of female slaves ready to fight for their freedom (Gaspar and Hine ix).

By making Mintah a leader of a ship mutiny, D’Aguiar agrees with those historians who believe that women were capable of not only performing subtle acts of resistance in the domestic sphere such as “working slowly” or “falsifying illness” but also of organised violent uprisings (Myers 144). Mintah’s status as the revolt’s instigator becomes apparent in the following passage:

In her other hand she showed them [the slaves in the men’s section of the Zong] a few long nails and a file. The men smiled and nodded. They crept forward and all wanted to talk to her at once. […] Mintah stopped them and explained that they were not to free themselves right away. They should conceal the file and nails until they got her signal. (D’Aguiar 87–8)

The way men slaves accept Mintah not only as a provider of weapons but also as a leader of the revolt shows D’Aguiar’s commitment to depict the female slave experience in a historically accurate manner. As David Richardson notes, even though primary sources mainly report that rebellions at sea were led by male slaves, “the role of women in supporting or encouraging revolts has perhaps not been fully appreciated” (76). Richardson explains that

[u]nlike men, women were rarely shackled on board ship, even at the African coast. Moreover, though usually housed separately from adult males, women were often accommodated close to the officers’ quarters as well as to weapon stores and keys. Because they were sometimes abused sexually by the crew, they may also have had better access to information vital to the planning of revolts. (76)

The four young men bunched behind Mintah. One had a pike ready. Nails were gripped by the three others. […] They grabbed a crewman who was walking past and was too surprised even to scream. The pike was brought down on his head several times while the others tore his skin with their nails. […] Mintah signalled them to stop. The sailor swayed on his knees. Mintah grabbed him and the men helped her lift him. They hoisted him high into the air, screamed in triumph and threw him over the side. (D’Aguiar 106–7).

5. Literacy

Since many states prohibited slaves from learning how to read and write, slave literacy in the antebellum era symbolised resistance (Cornelius 174). Especially for women slaves, who had to face an even greater oppression than men slaves, literary independence was an important tool of empowerment; however, Winifred Morgan notes that “[w]hile male [slave] narrators accentuate the role of literacy, females stress the importance of relationships” (76). As Morgan explains,

[t]hrough their use of language, male narrators strove to demonstrate their place as men among men, that they had a right to autonomy in a political democracy based on a voter’s ability to understand and debate the issues. […] Women narrators related to feminine culture of their time, and that involved telling their stories in terms of relationships. (76)

[H]e hugs me up to my feet with the book pressed between me and him. My head swims with the cheering and clapping and whistles.

‘Mintah, all my life I search for you.’

‘All of mine I been waiting for you.’

Simon and my book are in my arms. (D’Aguiar 221)

The power of Mintah’s writing is further highlighted by the fact that her book acts as a counterpoint to the captain’s ledger which “is, in this case, a death sentence, a tomb” (Hartman 2): while each slave thrown into the sea is entered into the Zong’s logbook as a mere hashmark, Mintah’s written account gives voice to the dead and undermines the captain’s authority to reduce slaves to anonymous numbers on a page.

In contrast to traditional female slave narratives, Mintah’s literacy is also not marginalised but rather presented as a turning point in the novel, since her book resurfaces during the court trial between the Zong’s owners and the insurance company. By providing evidence against the Zong’s crew, Mintah’s ability to write poses a threat to the slavers, and thus plays a key role in the text. Furthermore, Feeding the Ghosts challenges the assumption that “being literate never saved women […] from the burdens of slavery” by showing how literacy offered Mintah a relief from the horrors of captivity (Morgan 82). Upon finding a trunk with writing utensils in the ship’s storeroom, Mintah feels at peace again:

Is that why I sleep so deep? Knowing I’ve found a way to get what I see on this ship out of me? Ink, pen and paper as if an answer to the prayer I never got around to offering. And I laugh because it’s as if I have come across a trunk with soil in it. The soil I thought I would never see. (D’Aguiar 191)

Conclusion

However, this essay should not imply that women ex-slave authors did not provide an important insight into the oppression a female slave had to face as a “[b]lack in a white society, slave in a free society, [and a] woman in a society ruled by men” (Gray White 15). Female slave narratives reveal that slave women were victims of not only institutionalised slavery but paradoxically also of the abolitionist movement.

The former, i.e. the impact of slavery on female slaves, is best summarised by Harriet Jacobs who famously wrote that

“[s]lavery is terrible for men: but it is far more terrible for women. Superadded to the burden common to all, they have wrongs, and sufferings, and mortifications peculiar to their own” (119).

Since white abolitionists used female slave narratives as evidence that black women were able to comply with Christian moral values as well as antebellum ideals of femininity, and therefore deserved to be freed, they often imposed their own standards of pure womanhood on the ex-slaves’ texts (Morgan 90). Hence, if “the narrative lives of the [male] ex-slaves were as much possessed and used by the abolitionists as their actual lives had been by slaveholders”, then a female slave’s life had been instrumentalised not two but three times: by slavers, abolitionists, and the cult of true womanhood (Olney 51). Since the latter required women (slave narrators) to present themselves as pure, nurturing figures serving their communities rather than autonomous “rugged individualists” chasing personal goals as was common for men (slave narrators), female slave narratives are filled with silences when it comes to sexual abuse, motherhood, religion, violent revolts, and literacy (Morgan 83).

However, in the last few decades, this silence became a subject of interest to historians, sociologists, literary critics but also novelists such as Fred D’Aguiar. In contrast to less artistic approaches, D’Aguiar did more than fill in the gaps: by changing the gender of the jettison survivor from male to female and re-imaging the Zong massacre as well as its aftermath through the eyes of a female heroine, he revealed the parts of slave women’s history which had until then been supressed into invisibility. Thus, Feeding the Ghosts creates a counter-memory for not only the victims of the Zong but also for all female slaves previously silenced both in their lives and on paper.

Works Cited

Primary Texts

D’Aguiar, Fred. 1997. Feeding the Ghosts. London: Granta, 2014. Print.

Jacobs, Harriet. 1861. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. New York: Oxford UP, 1988. Print.

Secondary Sources

Barrett, Lindon. “African-American Slave Narratives: Literacy, the Body, Authority.” American Literary History 7.3 (1995): 415–42. Print.

Brown, Vincent. The Reaper’s Garden: Death and Power in the World of Atlantic Slavery. London: Harvard UP, 2008. Print.

Cornelius, Janet. “‘We Slipped and Learned to Read’: Slave Accounts of the Literacy Process, 1830–1865.” Phylon 44.3 (1983): 171–86. Print.

Cutter, Martha J. “Dismantling ‘The Master’s House’: Critical Literacy in Harriet Jacobs’ ‘Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl’.” Callaloo 19.1 (1996): 209–25. Print.

Dadzie, Stella. “Searching for the Invisible Woman: Slavery and Resistance in Jamaica.” Race & Class 32.2 (1990): 21–38. Print.

DeGout, Y. Yasmin. “Gender Issues and the Slave Narratives: ‘Incidents in the Life’ and ‘Narrative of the Life’ Compared.” The Sixth Section of the Fifth Annual MELUS Conference “American Voices: Discourses of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity” (1991): 1–12. Print.

Dunaway, Wilma A. Slavery and Emancipation in the Mountain South: Evidence, Sources, and Methods. Web. 30 Aug 2018. <http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/faculty_archives/mountain_slavery/slave.htm>.

Floyd, Samuel A. Jr. The Power of Black Music: Interpreting its History from Africa to the United States. New York: Oxford UP, 1995. Print.

Frías, Maria, and Fred D’Aguiar. “‘Building Bridges Back to the Past’: An Interview with Fred D’Aguiar.” Callaloo 25.2 (2002): 418–25. Print.

Gaspar, David Harry and Darlene Clark Hine. More Than Chattel: Black Women and Slavery in the Americas. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1996. Print.

Gray White, Deborah. 1985. Ar’n’t I a Woman? Female Slaves in the Plantation South. New York: Norton, 1999. Print.

Hall, Rebecca. Not Killing Me Softly: African American Women, Slave Revolts, and Historical Constructions of Racialized Gender. Diss. University of California, 2004. Web. 29 Aug 2018.

Hartman, Saidiya. “Venus in Two Acts.” Small Axe 12.2 (2008): 1–14. Print.

Hoare, Prince. Memoirs of Granville Sharp, Esq. Composed from his Manuscripts and Other Authentic Documents in the Possession of his Family and of the African Institution. London: Henry Colburn, 1820. Print.

Jensen, Loucynda. “Searching the Silence: Finding Black Women’s Resistance to Slavery in Antebellum U.S. History.” PSU McNair Scholars Online Journal 2.1 (2006): 1–27. Web. 26 Aug 2018.

Lahure, Carole Sylvie. Reclaiming One’s Own Voice and Identity: the African American Slave

Narrative and its Evolution. Diss. University of Luxembourg, 2013. Web. 28 Aug 2018.

Lewis, Andrew. “Martin Dockray and the Zong: A Tribute in the Form of Chronology.” The Journal of Legal History 28.3 (2007): 357–70. Print.

Meillassoux, Claude. “Female Slavery.” Women and Slavery in Africa. Eds. Claire C. Robertson and Martin A. Klein. Madison: Wisconsin UP, 1983. 49–68. Print.

Monitz, Ariel. “Black Women in American Literature: Slavery Through Slave Narratives and Contemporary Fiction.” Hohonu 13 (2015): 32–7. Print.

Morgan, Winifred. “Gender-Related Difference in the Slave Narratives of Harriet Jacobs and Frederick Douglass.” American Studies 35.2 (1994): 73–94. Print.

Myers, Chakrabarti Amrita. “‘Sisters in Arms’: Slave Women’s Resistance to Slavery in the United States.” Past Imperfect 5 (1996): 141–74. Print.

Nudelman, Franny. “Harriet Jacobs and the Sentimental Politics of Female Suffering.” ELH 59.4 (1992): 939–64. Print.

Olney, James. “‘I was Born’: Slave Narratives, Their Status as Autobiography and as Literature.” Callaloo 20 (1984): 46–73. Print.

Padhi, Prasanta Kumar. “The Emergence of Black Literature and the Tragic Portrayal: Black Women in the Slave Narratives.” Journal of Humanities and Social Science 19.11 (2014): 23–8. Print.

Richardson, David. “Shipboard Revolts, African Authority, and the Atlantic Slave Trade.” The William and Mary Quarterly 58.1 (2001): 69–92. Print.

Smith Foster, Frances. Witnessing Slavery. Westport: Greenwood P, 1979. Print.

Spillers, Hortense J. “Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book.” Diacritics 17.2 (1987): 64–81. Print.

Tanner, Laura E. “Self-Conscious Representation in the Slave Narrative.” Black American Literature Forum 21.4 (1987): 415–24. Print.

Taves, Ann. “Spiritual Purity and Sexual Shame: Religious Themes in the Writing of Harriet Jacobs.” Church History 56.1 (1987): 59–72. Print.

Turner, Sasha. “The Nameless and the Forgotten: Maternal Grief, Sacred Protection, and the Archive of Slavery.” Slavery & Abolition 38.2 (2017): 232–50. Print.

Welter, Barbara. “The Cult of True Womanhood: 1820–1860.” American Quarterly 18.2 (1966): 151–74. Print.

Wood, Sarah. “Exorcizing the Past: The Slave Narrative as Historical Fantasy.” Feminist Review 85 (2007): 83–96. Print.

Creative Writing student in Nottingham. Published by The London Magazine, Ambit, Firewords, Poetry Society, The Moth, Acumen, etc. On Twitter as @VitovaDenisa

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store